top of page
  • Writer's pictureHobbs & Associates

Types of Cooling Towers

Types of Cooling Towers

Cooling towers are essential components in many industrial and HVAC systems. They facilitate heat rejection by transferring waste heat from the process or building cooling systems to the atmosphere. Various types exist, each suited to different requirements and operating scales. Understanding each cooling tower type's distinct features, advantages, and applications is crucial for selecting the most appropriate system for a specific need.


Open Circuit Cooling Towers

Open circuit (or open loop) cooling towers are the most common type. In these systems, hot water from the process or building is directly exposed to the atmosphere. As the water is distributed over the fill material, it comes into direct contact with air, allowing a portion of the water to evaporate, which removes heat from the remaining water. The cooled water is then collected at the bottom and recirculated back into the system. Open circuit towers are widely used due to their efficiency and simplicity but require regular water treatment to prevent scaling, fouling, and microbial growth.


Closed Circuit Cooling Towers (Fluid Coolers)

Closed circuit cooling towers, also known as fluid coolers, pass the process fluid (water or a water-glycol mixture) through a heat exchanger coil, cooled by water sprayed over the coil and air drawn through the tower. This design keeps the process fluid separate from the air and the external environment, reducing contamination risk. These towers are ideal for applications where fluid purity is critical and in environments prone to freezing, as the process fluid in the coil is less likely to freeze than in open circuit systems.


Evaporative Condensers

Evaporative condensers combine the features of a cooling tower and a condenser. They are specifically designed for systems where refrigerant needs to be condensed. The refrigerant is circulated through coils, which are then sprayed with water. As air is pulled over the coils, the water evaporates, removing heat from the refrigerant and condensing it back to a liquid. Evaporative condensers are highly efficient and often used in industrial refrigeration, air conditioning systems, and processes requiring large-scale cooling capacity.


Hybrid Cooling Towers

Hybrid cooling towers offer a combination of wet and dry cooling in a single unit, allowing for operation in either mode depending on environmental conditions and water conservation needs. In dry mode, they function like air-cooled heat exchangers, using only air to cool the process fluid. In wet mode, water is sprayed over the heat exchangers to enhance cooling through evaporation. Hybrid towers are particularly beneficial in areas with water usage restrictions or for applications where minimizing water loss is a priority.


Selection Considerations

The choice between different types of cooling towers depends on several factors, including cooling capacity requirements, water availability, environmental regulations, energy efficiency goals, and initial vs. operational cost considerations. Each type offers unique benefits and is suited to specific applications, making it important to thoroughly evaluate the operational context before selecting.


In addition to the broad categories of cooling towers like open circuit, closed circuit, evaporative condensers, and hybrid towers, another important distinction within cooling tower technology is the airflow pattern relative to the water flow. This distinction categorizes cooling towers into two primary types: crossflow and counterflow. Each type has unique advantages and operational characteristics influencing efficiency, space requirements, maintenance, and application suitability.


Crossflow Cooling Towers

In crossflow cooling towers, the airflow is perpendicular to the water flow. Water is distributed at the top of the tower and flows downwards through the fill material by gravity. As it does so, the air is drawn across the fill in a direction that crosses the water flow. This design allows for the use of gravity-fed water distribution systems, which can reduce the pump energy requirements. Crossflow towers are characterized by their lower initial pressure drop and the possibility for easier maintenance and inspection of the fill material due to the more accessible design. However, they may require more plan area than counterflow towers for the same cooling capacity, making them less suitable for locations with limited space.


Counterflow Cooling Towers

Counterflow cooling towers feature a design where the airflow is directly opposite to the water flow. In these towers, air is drawn up through the fill material while water is distributed at the top and flows downward. This counter-directional approach allows for a more compact tower design, making counterflow towers preferable in applications where space is at a premium. The counterflow design typically achieves a higher cooling efficiency and better heat transfer performance than crossflow towers due to the maximized air-water contact time. However, this efficiency comes at the cost of higher pump head requirements for the water distribution system, which can increase the system's energy consumption. Additionally, the fill material in counterflow towers can be more challenging to access for maintenance and inspection.


Watch our Cooling Tower Design and Selection video below:




Choosing Between Crossflow and Counterflow Cooling Towers


The decision between crossflow and counterflow cooling towers hinges on several factors:


  • Space Availability: Counterflow towers are more space-efficient and are often chosen for limited spaces. Crossflow towers might be preferable when there's ample space.

  • Energy Efficiency: Counterflow towers are generally more efficient but may have higher energy costs associated with pumping water. Crossflow towers can offer savings on energy used for water distribution.

  • Maintenance and Accessibility: Crossflow towers provide easier access to fill and distribution systems, potentially lowering maintenance costs and efforts.

  • Initial Investment vs. Operational Costs: The choice may also be influenced by the balance between upfront costs and long-term operational expenses, including maintenance and energy use.


Ultimately, selecting a cooling tower type, whether crossflow or counterflow, should align with the project's requirements, considering operational efficiency, space constraints, budget, and maintenance capabilities.


Do you want to learn more about cooling tower design and selection? 


See our YouTube video here: https://youtu.be/qWbNTnw07Wo

5 views0 comments

Comments


bottom of page